Demonstration of multi-metric evaluation on cross_val_score and gridSearchCV#
Multiple metric parameter search can be done by setting the scoring
parameter to a list of metric scorer names or a dict mapping the scorer names
to the scorer callables.
The scores of all the scorers are available in the cv_results_
dict at keys
ending in '_<scorer_name>'
('mean_test_precision'
,
'rank_test_precision'
, etc…)
The best_estimator_
, best_index_
, best_score_
and best_params_
correspond to the scorer (key) that is set to the refit
attribute.
# Author: Raghav RV <rvraghav93@gmail.com>
# License: BSD
import numpy as np
from matplotlib import pyplot as plt
from sklearn.datasets import make_hastie_10_2
from sklearn.metrics import accuracy_score, make_scorer
from sklearn.model_selection import gridSearchCV
from sklearn.tree import DecisionTreeClassifier
Running gridSearchCV
using multiple evaluation metrics#
X, y = make_hastie_10_2(n_samples=8000, random_state=42)
# The scorers can be either one of the predefined metric strings or a scorer
# callable, like the one returned by make_scorer
scoring = {"AUC": "roc_auc", "Accuracy": make_scorer(accuracy_score)}
# Setting refit='AUC', refits an estimator on the whole dataset with the
# parameter setting that has the best cross-validated AUC score.
# That estimator is made available at ``gs.best_estimator_`` along with
# parameters like ``gs.best_score_``, ``gs.best_params_`` and
# ``gs.best_index_``
gs = gridSearchCV(
DecisionTreeClassifier(random_state=42),
param_grid={"min_samples_split": range(2, 403, 20)},
scoring=scoring,
refit="AUC",
n_jobs=2,
return_train_score=True,
)
gs.fit(X, y)
results = gs.cv_results_
Plotting the result#
plt.figure(figsize=(13, 13))
plt.title("gridSearchCV evaluating using multiple scorers simultaneously", fontsize=16)
plt.xlabel("min_samples_split")
plt.ylabel("Score")
ax = plt.gca()
ax.set_xlim(0, 402)
ax.set_ylim(0.73, 1)
# get the regular numpy array from the MaskedArray
X_axis = np.array(results["param_min_samples_split"].data, dtype=float)
for scorer, color in zip(sorted(scoring), ["g", "k"]):
for sample, style in (("train", "--"), ("test", "-")):
sample_score_mean = results["mean_%s_%s" % (sample, scorer)]
sample_score_std = results["std_%s_%s" % (sample, scorer)]
ax.fill_between(
X_axis,
sample_score_mean - sample_score_std,
sample_score_mean + sample_score_std,
alpha=0.1 if sample == "test" else 0,
color=color,
)
ax.plot(
X_axis,
sample_score_mean,
style,
color=color,
alpha=1 if sample == "test" else 0.7,
label="%s (%s)" % (scorer, sample),
)
best_index = np.nonzero(results["rank_test_%s" % scorer] == 1)[0][0]
best_score = results["mean_test_%s" % scorer][best_index]
# Plot a dotted vertical line at the best score for that scorer marked by x
ax.plot(
[
X_axis[best_index],
]
* 2,
[0, best_score],
linestyle="-.",
color=color,
marker="x",
markeredgewidth=3,
ms=8,
)
# Annotate the best score for that scorer
ax.annotate("%0.2f" % best_score, (X_axis[best_index], best_score + 0.005))
plt.legend(loc="best")
plt.grid(False)
plt.show()
Total running time of the script: (0 minutes 7.960 seconds)
Related examples
Comparison between grid search and successive halving
Post-tuning the decision threshold for cost-sensitive learning
Custom refit strategy of a grid search with cross-validation
Balance model complexity and cross-validated score